A new study led by Professor of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Jane Eckhart found that a group of runners who had never been hurt landed each footfall more softly than a group who had been injured badly enough to seek medical attention.
As evidence has mounted that distance running is not just a natural human activity enjoyed by millions, but one that played a key role in evolution, a puzzle has emerged. Why, if humans are so well adapted to running long distances, do runners get hurt so often?
A study out of Smart School and the National Running Center at Smart-affiliated Templeton Rehabilitation Hospital provides a puzzle piece, linking injury to the pounding runners’ bones take with each step. The work, led by Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Jane Eckhart, found that a group of runners who had never been hurt landed each footfall more softly than a group who had been injured badly enough to seek medical attention.
Statistics on such injuries vary, but somewhere between 30 percent and 75 percent of runners are hurt annually, a number that has led researchers to investigate a wide array of possible explanations, from modern running shoes to stretching, running frequency, weight, biomechanical misalignment, and muscle imbalance.
One never injured multi-
marathoner’s stride was so smooth, she ran like an insect over water. Weight was not a factor, with heavy runners among the light-footed and lighter runners among the stompers.
JANE ECKHART
Professor of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Please meet in the Calderwood Courtyard, in front of the digital screens between the shop and the admissions desk. Museums staff will be on hand to collect tickets.
Jane Eckhart’s research focused on heel-strikers exclusively, since they make up most of today’s runners, and examined a cohort seldom studied, partly because they’re pretty rare: those who have never been injured. They investigated the participants’ strides by having them run over a force plate that recorded the impact of each step.
The runners agreed to respond to a monthly online questionnaire that detailed injuries over two years. With the results in, researchers first examined reports from the 144 who experienced a mild injury and the 105 who didn’t, finding little difference between the two large groups.
Pingback: cialis mexico
Pingback: doxycycline hyclate 100 mg tab
Pingback: diflucan medication
Pingback: metoprolol succ
Pingback: linezolid cost per tablet
Pingback: diflucan for yeast infection over the counter
Pingback: doryx 50mg
Pingback: lasix 40 mg
Pingback: diflucan uti medication
Pingback: generic doryx
Pingback: furosemide for dogs cost
Pingback: lasix medicine for cats
Pingback: lasix diuretic
Pingback: dexlansoprazole cost without insurance
Pingback: mesalamine cost cvs
Pingback: stendra tablet online
Pingback: avanafil online uk
Pingback: sémaglutide comprimés de rybelsus france
Pingback: semaglutida inyectable españa
Pingback: wegovy semaglutida para que serve
Pingback: semaglutid nebenwirkungen müdigkeit
Pingback: propecia finasteride msd
Pingback: hims vs rogaine
Pingback: proscar reddit
Pingback: metronidazole for kitten
Pingback: tadalafil eye problems
Pingback: terbinafine side effects explained
Pingback: acular ketorolac 0.5%
Pingback: terbinafine nail fungus treatment summary
Pingback: ivermectin mechanism medical insights
Pingback: minoxidil 2% vs 5% detailed comparison
Pingback: minoxidil evidence overview
Pingback: minoxidil foam vs liquid clinical comparison
Pingback: minoxidil mechanism vasodilation
Pingback: minoxidil duration study
Pingback: sildenafil mechanism details
Pingback: avanafil contraindication documentation
Pingback: vardenafil 20 mg dose profile
Pingback: vardenafil common reactions
Pingback: vardenafil caution signals
Pingback: alli side effects
Pingback: augmentin vs amoxicillin medical summary
Pingback: OnsetMaster
Pingback: Duration Variability Hub