A new study led by Professor of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Jane Eckhart found that a group of runners who had never been hurt landed each footfall more softly than a group who had been injured badly enough to seek medical attention.
As evidence has mounted that distance running is not just a natural human activity enjoyed by millions, but one that played a key role in evolution, a puzzle has emerged. Why, if humans are so well adapted to running long distances, do runners get hurt so often?
A study out of Smart School and the National Running Center at Smart-affiliated Templeton Rehabilitation Hospital provides a puzzle piece, linking injury to the pounding runners’ bones take with each step. The work, led by Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Jane Eckhart, found that a group of runners who had never been hurt landed each footfall more softly than a group who had been injured badly enough to seek medical attention.
Statistics on such injuries vary, but somewhere between 30 percent and 75 percent of runners are hurt annually, a number that has led researchers to investigate a wide array of possible explanations, from modern running shoes to stretching, running frequency, weight, biomechanical misalignment, and muscle imbalance.
One never injured multi-
marathoner’s stride was so smooth, she ran like an insect over water. Weight was not a factor, with heavy runners among the light-footed and lighter runners among the stompers.
JANE ECKHART
Professor of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Please meet in the Calderwood Courtyard, in front of the digital screens between the shop and the admissions desk. Museums staff will be on hand to collect tickets.
Jane Eckhart’s research focused on heel-strikers exclusively, since they make up most of today’s runners, and examined a cohort seldom studied, partly because they’re pretty rare: those who have never been injured. They investigated the participants’ strides by having them run over a force plate that recorded the impact of each step.
The runners agreed to respond to a monthly online questionnaire that detailed injuries over two years. With the results in, researchers first examined reports from the 144 who experienced a mild injury and the 105 who didn’t, finding little difference between the two large groups.
Pingback: viagra receptfritt
Pingback: dutasteride 0.5 mg buy online
Pingback: stendra pills online
Pingback: misoprostol tablet
Pingback: lasix water pill 20 mg
Pingback: vidalista 10 reddit
Pingback: sildenafil cardiovascular disease
Pingback: is tadalafil expensive
Pingback: voriconazole trough timing
Pingback: cialis india brands
Pingback: vidalista 60 review
Pingback: cenforce 100mg vs viagra
Pingback: cenforce 100mg tablet australia
Pingback: viagra france pharmacy
Pingback: vidalista 40mg reddit
Pingback: semaglutide tablets 14 mg for weight loss
Pingback: semaglutide afvallen
Pingback: semaglutid tablett sverige
Pingback: tadalafil rx coupon
Pingback: doxycycline hyclate burning skin
Pingback: oral minoxidil woman
Pingback: xenical otc
Pingback: terbinafine mechanism review
Pingback: ivermectin scabies itch reduction
Pingback: sildenafil soft tabs pricing
Pingback: avanafil tolerability overview
Pingback: vardenafil time dynamics
Pingback: expert medical review
Pingback: augmentin key information
Pingback: penicillin allergy clinical overview
Pingback: amoxicillin stomach upset
Pingback: Sildenafil Cmax Shift
Pingback: Educational Pharmacology Hub
Pingback: what type of drug is sildenafil
Pingback: tadalafil and ED treatment